..... 18th May - 'Biggest ever' anti fox hunting demo
scheduled for 29th May
.... 16th May - May confirms she
will hold free vote on repealing the Hunting Act
15th May - S.Herefordshire FH said to have killed all but four of their hounds
..... 12th May - Hunt criticised after death of 9 year old girl while out with the Cotswold FH
..... 8th May - Leak reveals hunters asked to make huge push to obtain
..... 5th May - Isle of Wight FH
appeal for funds to fix their 'dire' finances
3rd May - RSPCA and Save Me endorse strengthening of the Hunting Act
..... 2nd May - Revealed that Kimblewick FH btb outbreak advised on by vets close to the Hunt
..... 29th April - Farmer involved with Fife FH shoots restrained stray
dog dead in front of its owner
..... 28th April - Jedforest
FH 2 defence claim 'invisible' [and inaudible] gunman made fox hunt legal
..... 28th April - Eggesford FH official convicted of stealing £48,000 from hunt supporters club
..... 27th April - Court shown film of fox dig, flushing and chase at Jedforest
..... 25th April - Fitzwilliam FH illegal hunting
case adjourned yet again
..... 24th April - Man charged
over fox found captive near Belvoir FH kennels in December 2015
..... 24th April - Anti has to fight police to get copy of apology by cautioned supporter who abused her last year
..... 22nd April - Sabs stop Cheriton Mink Hounds from hunting
..... 21st April - Terrified deer jumps 30ft off bridge on to road to escape
hounds - shot by Quantock SH gunman
..... 20th April
- POWA presses for commitment to strengthen the Hunting Act in Labour manifesto
..... 20th April - Atherstone FH secret meeting with Town Council exposed by sabs
..... 14th April - Badsworth FH filmed trespassing on canal towpath, not for first time
..... 11th April - Minehead Harriers hunt on NT land where bTb breakdown recently
..... 7th April - Police powers to demand removal of face coverings enhanced
..... 6th April - VWH FH run away as monitors find hounds marking fox to ground
..... 6th April - Vale of the White Horse FH slaughter fox in front of monitors - and hunt on main roads
..... 6th April - VWH FH relentlessly hunt fox late in day and may
..... 2nd April - Sabs upload
film of monitor car window being smashed at South Dorset FH meet
..... 1st April - 'Notorious' hunt supporter to be charged
at last over 'vicious assault'
'Biggest ever' anti fox hunting demo scheduled
for 29th May
18-5-17 Facebook - Dominic Dyer Thousands confirmed & rising fast. If you care be there, join biggest ever
anti fox hunt protest in London on Bank Holiday Monday 29 May.
May confirms will hold free vote on repealing Hunting
16-5-17 Independent Theresa May says she supports fox hunting because other ways of killing foxes are 'cruel' -
The PM wants to hold a vote on bringing back the animal killings Theresa May [below right] has defended her support for fox hunting, arguing that foxes must be killed
and that hunting them with dogs on horseback is the most humane way of doing so. The Prime Minister said she had “always
supported fox hunting” and that she would give Parliament a vote on bringing back the animal killings. “Some of
the other forms of dealing with foxes can be cruel, so my view is it should be a free vote for Parliament so members of parliament
individually should be able to exercise their view on this matter,” she said.
Fox hunting with hounds was outlawed
by Tony Blair's Labour government in 2004 but successive Conservative manifestos have pledged to bring the animal killings
back. A plot by pro-hunt Tories to bring back the spot was revealed in a leaked email this month. Lord Mancroft, the chair
of the Council of Hunting Associations, described the 8 June vote as “the chance we have been waiting for” to overturn the ban.
A large Tory majority in the House
of Commons would likely give pro-hunt Conservatives insulation from any rebellion by anti-hunt Conservatives to stop the repeal
of the ban. David Cameron had planned to hold a vote on repealing the ban but never did so after the threat of rebellion reared
its head. Ms May said she did not consider the issue “important” and that MPs would be able to decide what happened
to the animals if she became PM.
“This is a subject on which you are either for it or against it. I have always supported
fox hunting, but clearly I'm not saying I'm going to bring it back,” she told a Facebook Live session hosted
by ITV News. What I'm saying is we will have a free vote in Parliament so MPs will be able to make up their own mind on
this issue. This isn't the most important issue facing people at this election. I think the most important issue is about
who's going to provide the leadership for the future to take us through Brexit and beyond."
A poll conducted in
the run-up to Boxing Day 2016 found that opposition to fox hunting has hit an all-time high. A full 84 per cent of the public
now believe fox hunting should not be made legal again, according to a survey by Ipsos MORI.
18-5-17 Daily Mail Outrage as Theresa May confirms a Commons vote on scrapping the ban
on fox hunting WILL be held - Manifesto pledge will outrage animal rights activists ahead of the snap election
Theresa May provoked outrage today as she confirmed she would call a Commons vote on scrapping the ban on fox hunting. The
League Against Cruel Sports said there was 'no justification' for scrapping the law against hunting with dogs. The
lobby group said the controversial laws should instead be properly enforced, insisting the public as a whole did not back
hunting. Mrs May promised a free vote on Government laws for the measure - but did not put a timescale on when the vote would
Prime Minister has said she would vote to lift the ban on fox hunting despite never having taken part in a hunt - insisting
it was less cruel than other ways of controlling foxes. But it is hard to forecast how the new Commons might split on the
issue. The 2015 Parliament was thought never likely to endorse repealing the ban.
Eduardo Gonçalves, Chief Executive of the League Against
Cruel Sports, said: 'We're disappointed to see the commitment to a free vote on the Hunting Act included in the manifesto
given the strong support the ban on hunting has among Conservative MPs and Conservative voters. 'Hopefully any attempt
to repeal, weaken or replace the Hunting Act will be prevented by those members of all parties who oppose the killing of animals
for fun. I think most people can see through attempts to claim that hunting is somehow good for the animals that are killed,
and these figures show the reality. The intention of the Hunting Act was to stop animals suffering because of hunting –
and if the law had been properly enforced we believe it would have helped up to 2.8 million animals.'
He added: 'Contrary to what the Prime Minister mistakenly
said, anyone who feels the need to kill foxes should never use hunting with dogs, as it is in fact one of the cruellest methods
available. This is due to the long chases of the target animal involved. There is enough evidence to suggest that hunted animals
suffer whilst being chased by dogs regardless of how they are then eventually killed.' The Prime Minister has said she
would vote to lift the ban on fox hunting despite never having taken part in a hunt.
Speaking earlier in the election campaign Mrs May said she would
personally vote to repeal the ban. She said: 'This is a situation on which individuals will have one view or the other,
either pro or against. 'As it happens personally I have always been in favour of fox hunting and we maintain out commitment
- we have had a commitment previously as a Conservative Party - to allow a free vote. And that's what it will allow, Parliament
the opportunity to take a decision on this.'
The manifesto pledge said: 'We will grant a free vote, on
a government bill in government time, to give parliament the opportunity to decide the future of the Hunting Act.' David
Cameron was thwarted in his attempt to call a vote on repealing fox hunting after the 2015 election. While he also promised
a free vote he sought to win and the SNP announcing they would vote against it left the measure ripe for defeat and the motion
S.Herefordshire FH said to have killed all but four of
15-5-17 Facebook - Hunt Investigation Team Shocking news has reached us 'The South Herefordshire
Hunt have shot all their hounds'. We received this message from a highly trusted source from within the Hunt. This source
has provided accurate intelligence throughout. They went on to clarify that 4 had been spared, to make sure the bloodline
survives presumably. We estimate that 30+ dogs will have been shot (they are normally shot in the head).
This is devastating news, no attempts were made to rehome these dogs
and it is just the latest example of the brutal and callous disregard that Hunts generally and the South Herefordshire in
particularly have towards the lives of animals. These are just 4 of the hounds - we don't know of their individual fate.
We also know that the kennels are empty of hounds and hunt personnel in preparation for the sale and redevelopment of the
site. Please share this story.
Pic below - Four of the hounds - not known if any of them have survived
15-5-17 Facebook - Three Counties Hunt Saboteurs The South Herefordshire Hunt have killed all but 4 of their pack according to sources. One couple
sent to the Ledbury, we do not know about the others. This is following a year of not hunting because of the ongoing police
investigation concerning cruelty at the kennels. Killing unwanted foxhounds is something most hunts
do. Hounds are culled if they don't fit in, are too old, or there are too many of them for the hunt's requirements.
Hounds are also victims and they were probably terrified as they were taken out one by one to be shot.
Pic below - The S.Herefordshire pack before they stopped hunting
15-5-17 Facebook - Welsh Border Hunt Sabs So - the crows have been gathering around the now redundant SHFH
kennels- but not for road kill. A mass murder is alleged to have taken place very recently of all but 2 couple of their hounds-(one
of which, we are told, the Ledbury hunt now have and not sure of the whereabouts of the other). The plot indeed thickens!
It would appear the SHFH have now decided to form a "Hunt Club" with the intention of inviting other packs to come
and hunt their country- obviously pocketing what ever revenue that would bring in. And lets not forget their new forged allegiance
with their very "special Friends The Ledbury!" Clearly there is unrest amongst the creatures of the countryside
as the birds, big and small continue to chatter, alerting all to the evil in our midst.....
9 year old girl killed in accident while hunting with the
Inquest hears criticism of level of supervision of child riders
Swindon Advertiser Greater supervision needed for youngsters riding as part of a hunt, inquest
hears The level of supervision of children at a hunt meeting where a nine year old girl died after
being kicked by a horse was 'far short of what could reasonably be expected,' an inquest was told. Health and Safety
expert Philip Park, who investigated the tragic death of Bonnie Armitage, said he believes children under eleven taking part
in hunts should be supervised by adults on a one to one basis.
The inquest has heard that tragic Bonnie, of Faringdon, Oxon, was one of five children all under the supervision
of one adult rider, Melissa Kennedy, at the meeting of the Cotswold Hunt in Miserden, nr Stroud, Glos, on April 2nd last year.
Bonnie was a pupil at St Hugh's preparatory school in Faringdon, Oxfordshire, where her father is deputy head. Bonnie
was riding her Shetland pony, Lindsay, when she was kicked in the chest by a large horse called Harvey which was being ridden
ahead of her by farmer and circus owner Toti Gifford, the inquest jury at Gloucester has been told.The Gloucester inquest
jury returned a conclusion of accidental death.
Park, a manager at Stroud district council, told the inquest "It is my view that the level of supervision fell short
of what could be reasonably expected. My conclusion was that had Bonnie been actively supervised by a responsible adult who
was in close contact with her there was a possibility she would have been instructed not to get too close to the horse in
front. That could have had the effect of preventing the injury. If she had not got too close to the horse in front of her
it could not have kicked her."
He told the inquest
he believed it would be helpful in future if Hunts set a stipulated level of competence for child participants. It would also
be helpful to have guidance on the ratios of children to supervising adults, he said. "I did not see any evidence that
the Cotswold Hunt makes any enquiry about the competence of child riders. They rely in parents to make the decision themselves
on the level of supervision that children should have at a hunt. "It is important for the Hunt to make a decision about
the level of supervision otherwise there will be no consistency in the way it is implemented."
Asked to expand more on his views of what should happen at hunts where young children are taking
part he said "Close supervision would mean one to one - one adult supervising one child. I would expect that adult to
stay with the child as much as possible during the hunt. "I accept there is a chaotic and fast moving atmosphere but
an adult could exercise more control over one child than one adult in charge of two or three children. I would suggest one
to one supervision is reasonably practicable."
Chamberlain, who was senior Master of the Hunt at the time but has now retired, told the jury agreed that the Hunt had not
made any rules about children taking part. "If poor Bonnie had been supervised one to one I fail to see how it would
have made any difference," he said. He believed that the real issue was the competence of both the young rider and the
horse, he said. When he took his own children hunting in the past he had always made sure they stayed behind him, he added.
But it had to be remembered, he said, that 'horses are dangerous at both ends' and riders should all be aware from
an early age of the need to keep space around them at all times.
Mr Gifford told the inquest he was cantering across a field on his horse Harvey - 'a lovely, calm, gentle giant'
- when the tragedy happened as Bonnie rode up alongside him. "My horse went irregular," he said. "He just didn't
feel right. Then I heard a yell. I looked back. My horse is really big and there was this really little horse, the Shetland,
underneath my feet almost. It went really fast, past me, and then carried on. Then I looked back and I saw Bonnie. At the
time the incident happened I was going forward, looking ahead. You never think there is anything behind you because you are
going forward. I just heard this yell. When I looked back she (Bonnie) was still landing. I pulled up. It's a bit of a
blur really. I can't really remember....I just jumped off my horse. I didn't hang on to him but he followed me back.
I went over. Then others all arrived. I can't really remember what happened, it was such a mad.....I grabbed all the horses
and led them away. Then she was lying there. Big blue eyes... The emergency services and ambulance came and then we realised
a helicopter was also coming."
He said his horse
had been hunting for several years and is a 'fantastic animal.' I think it (what happened) was an instinctive thing,
he was a bit shocked or frightened or spooked. I think, I don't know." He added "At the moment it happened it
felt like the horse had gone lame. I thought maybe I had gone into a hole or the horse had stumbled. I didn't think he
bucked. I just thought he had put his foot down a hole or lost a shoe or something had happened or he had stumbled on something."...
Det Inspector Wayne Ussher of Gloucestershire police said he had investigated
the tragedy and concluded that the accident 'could not have been prevented.' "She was following the main body
of riders in company with other children and under the care of a responsible adult. Her company approached the rear of a much
larger horse which took an irregular stride and struck her. She died as a result of injury sustained from a kick to the chest
by the horse but in the circumstances presented to me it could not have been prevented."
The inquest at Gloucester has heard Bonnie was one of about fifty riders at the last meeting
of the season of the Cotswold Hunt at Miserden House. A jury of ten people has been sworn in to hear the case. The inquest
heard a statement from Bonnie's dad, teacher Nick Armitage, formally identifying his daughter and describing her as a
'bright girl, fit and healthy, a good runner, she enjoyed everything... She was a very competent rider. She could walk,
trot, canter and gallop, She had been hunting many times at different hunts. She would sometimes be out for many hours. She
had hunted off a lead rein for two years. " He said the pony was eight years old and was 'experienced, dependable,
safe and doesn't spook.'...
The jury heard
that after the incident paramedics and an emergency doctor battled for 45 minutes to resuscitate Bonnie in the field before
she was airlifted to Gloucestershire Royal Hospital. But she was certified dead 15 minutes after arrival in the hospital.
After a retirement of one hour the jury of ten people brought in a verdict of accidental death without any further comment.
The coroner, Katy Skerrett, said she would consider over the next ten days whether to make recommendations about a minimum
level of competence being required for child riders at hunts, whether safety equipment should be a requirement and whether
children should be supervised...
comments - We send our condolences to Bonnie's family and friends for their tragic loss. However, we believe it is simply
wrong for Hunts to induct children, often much younger than nine, into the brutality of hunting with hounds and think it tantamount
to child abuse. It is, of course, also inherently dangerous.
Leak reveals hunters asked to make huge push for Tory landslide
CA vice-chair mobilises
Hunts to ensure Hunting Act can be repealed
Says they have assurance repeal vote will be in Tory manifesto
Daily Mirror 'This could be the chance we've been waiting for': Fox hunt
bosses' leaked Tory campaign email in full - The email urges hunt masters to “mobilise supporters” and campaign
for pro-hunting Tories in marginal seats Tonight, the Mirror revealed fox hunt masters' secret
plan to round up support for Theresa May, because they believe a Tory landslide would lead to the fox hunting ban being scrapped.
The email, sent to Hunts across the country by Tory peer Lord Mancroft [right], urges Hunt Masters to “mobilise
supporters” and campaign for pro-hunting Tories in marginal seats. He said a Tory majority of 50 or more MPs should
be enough to secure a repeal of the 2004 Hunting Act in a Parliamentary vote later this year. “This is the chance we have been waiting for,” Lord Mancroft wrote.
the email in full - 'While anything can change in a six-week election campaign, and we
know that the polls cannot be relied on, there is a real chance that on 8th June, Theresa May could achieve a majority significantly
in excess of the seventeen seats she currently has. A majority of fifty or more would give us a real opportunity for repeal
of the Hunting Act (HA), or perhaps an alternative legislative measure – but only if that leaves hunting in a better
position than it is now. It must be clearly understood that repeal is our primary objective, but also that politics is “the
art of the possible”, and we will take whichever option is the most advantageous to hunting when the time comes. It
will only become clear what our best option is after 8th June.
First, we need a
cast iron manifesto commitment from the Conservative Party, as we had in the last four election manifestos. Like everyone
else, we will have to wait until the manifesto is published on 8th May to be certain, but Simon Hart MP and I have received
assurances that such a commitment will be carried forward to the 2017 manifesto. I have made it clear that we will only provide
support on that basis, and that if the manifesto does not contain an acceptable commitment, we will withdraw our support.
It is important that everyone understands
why the idea that “the Government did not honour the manifesto commitments after the 2010 and 2015 elections”
is incorrect. On both occasions David Cameron made it clear that he would authorise and fully endorse a vote in a manner,
and at a time, of our choosing.
During the Coalition Government a vote could only take place if the Liberal Democrats agreed, which they did not.
After 2015 the Scottish Nationalists reversed their earlier commitment to abstain from any votes that did not impact Scotland,
and opposed the proposed Statutory Instrument, and consequently the Government Chief Whip did not think we could win a vote
in the House of Commons.
All the advice we received was that we should not risk such a vote unless we had a reasonable expectation
of winning. We therefore concluded it was not in hunting’s best interests to put the matter to a vote. I am sure that
was the correct decision. We have repeatedly made clear that we need a Government that has both a manifesto commitment to
repeal the HA, and a big enough majority to get repeal through the Commons and then the Lords.
It now looks, unexpectedly,
as if there is a very real chance we could get such a Government. While nothing in politics is certain, this is by far the
best opportunity we have had since the ban, and is probably the best we are likely to get in the foreseeable future. On that
basis, we must do everything we possibly can to maximise the chance of getting repeal of the HA. I am confident that every
Master will give the leadership and direction that our community needs at this seminal moment. Vote OK, under the direction
of George Bowyer, has already started to plan what we are all going to do during the campaign. A number of constituencies
do not yet have candidates, so there is a role for us in making sure that only candidates supportive of hunting are selected.
Vote OK will advise how best to achieve this.
We will only help candidates who give us an unequivocal commitment to support repeal when the time
comes. Nor do we need to help candidates in “safe seats” with large majorities. Instead we will concentrate on
those seats where we can make the most difference. Unless specifically advised to the contrary, every Hunt should assume that
it will be needed to assist with political work and start making arrangements to mobilise supporters now. Please make sure
that your Hunt has an active and effective Vote-OK Coordinator in place and that they are making regular contact with your
Regional Vote-OK Director (RVOD). Please do not wait to hear where your Hunt should go, but contact them as soon as possible.
If you do not know who your RVOD is, contact George Bowyer by email at [address redacted].
In the face of everything that has
happened over the last two decades, the hunting community has never given up fighting for our sport, for our hounds, and to
enable our children and their children to enjoy both, as we have. This is the chance we have been waiting for. We have six
weeks to show, yet again, what we are made of, and our undying commitment to our way of life. We have six weeks to win back
all that has been taken from us. Masters, if ever there was a time to give a lead, this is it. Please don’t waste a
single day of those six weeks.
Thank you. Benjamin Mancroft Chairman, Council
of Hunting Associations
adds - Old Etonian Lord Mancroft became JM of the Vale of the White Horse FH in 1987, the same year in which he
inherited his father's baronetcy, and held the Mastership for 11 years. In 1992, he became vice-chair of the
British Field Sports Society and then a Director, when it changed its name to the more user-friendly Countryside Alliance.
He was made vice-chair of the CA in 2005. His somewhat lurid past includes a time as a heroin addict, during which time he
acquired a conviction for theft. In February 2008, Mancroft claimed that NHS nurses who had treated him at the Royal
United Hospital in Bath were
"grubby, drunken and promiscuous". The hospital's Chief Executive, James Scott, called the accusations "damaging
and distressing", and requested that the peer retract them. Mancroft has so far refused to do this, or to apologise.
no surprise that a commitment for a repeal vote will be in the Conservative manifesto. The leadership has always seemed determined
to ignore the mass of public opinion, including an estimated 72% of their own voters, and push through Hunting Act repeal
to please their bloodsports loving friends if they got the opportunity. They probably thought that had come with the surprise
election result in 2015 and must have been aghast to find that many of the new intake of Tory MPs refused to support repeal.
They may find the same applies to the potential newbies this time round. Whether or not, they will face massive parliamentary
and public opposition and risk reviving the 'Nasty Party' image, just to get rid of a law that does not seem to much
inhibit organised Hunts anyway. Doubtless Vote OK will once more send out hunt supporters into marginal with instructions
to wear plain clothes and not bring up hunting on the doorsteps.
Isle of Wight FH appeals for funds to fix 'dire'
5-5-17 Isle of Wight Country Press
RSPCA and Save Me come out for strengthening of the
3-5-17 Guardian Letters Why the environment must be at the heart of the UK general election Fears about climate change, air pollution, waste and possible changes to the Hunting
Act concern readers from Brian May and Ranulph Fiennes to James Marsden of Much Marcle As party leaders prepare to sign
off on their election manifestos, we would like to draw their attention to a policy that has the overwhelming support of the
While 52% of British people voted to leave the EU, 84% want the ban on hunting foxes to stay, according to the latest
Ipsos Mori data. In addition, 88% support the ban on deer-hunting, and 91% back the ban on hunting hares. Support for the
ban among people in the countryside is at similar levels. Ipsos Mori projections indicate that there is a clear majority in
favour of the ban in every constituency in England and Wales, including that of all party leaders, and that voters view more
favourably those candidates who support the ban by a margin of more than seven to one over those who want it repealed.
We call on all party
leaders not only to rule out any repeal, weakening or substitution of the Hunting Act but also to support its strengthening
The Hunting Act is one of the most popular pieces of legislation on the statute book today. We’re asking party
leaders to send a clear, unambiguous message at this election that they fully intend to preserve Britain’s great natural
heritage, and ensure that cruelty to animals in the name of “sport” remains firmly in the past.
Chief executive, League Against Cruel Sports, Jeremy Cooper Chief executive, RSPCA, Anne Brummer CEO, Save Me Trust, Philip
Mansbridge Director, IFAW-UK, Bill Oddie President, League Against Cruel Sports, Dr Brian May Founder, Save Me Trust, Chris
Packham, Sir Ranulph Fiennes, Peter Egan...
POWAperson adds - Whilst POWA has
been calling for strengthening of the Hunting Act since before the ink was dry, LACS and IFAW only committed to it 2-3 years
ago. To our knowledge, however, this is the first time the RSPCA and SaveMe have publicly come out in favour, which is gratifying.
Revealed that Kimblewick FH btb outbreak advised
on by vets close to the Hunt
Limited past national hound testing showed a 10% bTb infection rate
2-5-17 Morethanjustbadgers.net Kimblewick Cover Up? I think most people will be aware by now that the Kimblewick
Hunt had to destroy a large number of their hounds due to being infected with bTB. The original story broken by our friends
over at Hounds Off can be read here. There is, justifiably a significant amount of concern from all sides regarding this news.
Defra have always maintained that the risk of contracting bTB for pets and dogs in particular is very low but when you consider
that hunting hounds are far from pets and live in conditions few would let their own companion animals live in you’ll
start to get closer to the point.
Hounds are kept in a pack, they eat, sleep and live in close proximity. Most importantly
they are fed on “fallen Stock”. These are animals which have died on surrounding farms for various and probably
untested reasons, that the hunt will collect as a service to the farmers, which are in turn given to the hounds as food. In
this instance it doesn’t take a genius to work out where the infection has come from. Another important point is the
hunting country of the Kimblewick. Although based at their kennels just outside Aylesbury they cover parts of the counties
of Bedfordshire, Buckinghamshire, Berkshire, Oxfordshire, Hampshire and Hertfordshire. An area which in total is roughly the
size of Cornwall. Now consider that some of these counties are considered as part of the edge zones in the fight against bTB
and the potential for the hounds to be spreading the disease over a vast area including those considered free from TB.
Obviously the risk
of spreading the disease by hounds, regardless of the what Defra claim, is going to be high. The M.Bovis bacterium can survive
for a significant time in the excrement left behind by the hounds, and they do leave a lot of it all over the place during
a day's hunting and is obviously never cleaned up by the hunt staff. So what is being done? Well obviously the kennels
were put under quarantine and the poor, affected hounds were shot. However that didn’t stop them from hunting. Visiting
packs were used and hunted on the Kimblewick’s ground. Further revelations came to light when once again Hounds Off
were sent a note which they in turn passed on to me. See below -
There are only two listed vets in
Berkhamstead I can find. St Johns and Clarke & Marshall. One would have to assume that is it one of these vets that are
involved (feel free to contact them and find out which one). With all due respect to the practices shown you would have expected
an organisation which specialised in bTB to be more appropriate. The equine vet in question, Bob Baskerville was originally
a partner in the Baskerville Horgan & Partners practice which is now part of Hampden Vets. Although he is not currently
listed as one of their equine staff, a quick Google search picks out several links between Baskerville and the Kimblewick
so it’s safe to assume he is indeed a member of the Hunt.
Lord Garnider of Kimble is as described
in the note, he was also chief spin doctor for the Countryside Alliance and is still an executive director. Clearly the hunting
fraternity were so deeply concerned about the implications of a hunt having bTB infected hounds they brought out their big
guns in collaboration with the CA in order to suppress the information for as long as they could (thank heavens for loose-lipped
hunt followers) and then be seen to be dealing with it properly once it became public knowledge. Of course the real problem
with this is a complete lack of impartiality. Any and all information which could have a negative effect on hunting in relation
to bTB will be withheld once again. Hunting simply cannot afford to have this sort of negative publicity and potentially lose
much of the ground they hunt over as concerned land owners withdraw their permission to hunt on their land. Many land owners
have already banned the Kimblewick from using their land and rightly so.
now time for all Hunts to have their hounds tested, especially those in the high risk areas and all hunting suspended until
each and every pack is given a clean bill of health. Considering it is now the hunting closed season you would expect this
to be the perfect time. The only previous data relating to TB in hounds came from a FOI request by Keep the Ban and published
by TB Free England and he summed up the response thus: “In the last 7 years, only 50 hunt hounds have been tested for
Bovine TB, 5 of those were positive of infection (10%). 45 samples from hounds were taken over the same period, of which 7
were potentially infected (16%).
The sample sizes are too small to determine the statistical significance, but it
does call Defra’s line that “M.bovis infection in dogs is extremely rare” into question… If they
haven’t looked, how do they know it’s rare? And when they did look and found more than 10% to be infected, doesn’t
this suggest it might be more of a problem than they thought?”
clear to me that this rabbit hole goes a lot deeper than those at Defra will admit, but while they’re so thoroughly
within the sphere of influence of the CA then we will probably never know the full extent of the problem and hunts will continue
to spread the disease over our countryside and badgers will continue to get the blame and die in their thousands.
Farmer involved with Fife FH kills restrained pet
dog in front of owner
Was in sheep field, but shooter had already tied dog up before he shot it
The man who allegedly killed the dog is the son of the Secretary of Fife FH and
the estate he was working on is owned by one of the JMs
29-4-17 Facebook - Tracy Ward On Thursday
27th of April, my sons dog, Stark, in my eyes was brutally murdered at the hands of a farmer by the name of Dave Bell, near
Collinsburgh, Balarres Estate.
Stark managed to escape from his family home, and in the short time he was out, he managed to get
into a field of sheep. I fully understand that if a farmer feels like his livestock is under threat of an animal, whether
it being a wild animal or family pet he has completed authority to shoot the the animal.
The law also states that if the farmer
FIRSTLY attempts to catch the dog, and restrain him with no further threat that it should be left alone and dealt with through
law. This was not the case, the farmer FIRSTLY caught Stark, TIED him to a tractor, THEN fired a warning shot, THEN shot him
The law also states that the dog can be shot if the farmer has attempted to contacted the dogs owner with no joy.
My son was in the field trying to get to Stark at the time of the shooting. He just didn't make it from where he was standing
in time to save his pet. The farmer had clearly seen him, and two family friends with in eye sight.
My son takes full
responsibility for the dog being in the field, he knows this is a serious matter. But none of us can understand why a fully
restrained dog should be shot dead in front of his owner. Stark
was such a gentle wee guy. He will be sorely missed. R.I.P our handsome boy ������.
Meet Stark, and the farmer who took his life.
Jedforest FH 2 defence claims 'invisible' gunman
made fox hunt legal
28-4-17 ITV Border News Father and son deny deliberately hunting fox with hounds A father and son
from the Jedforest Hunt have denied breaching Scotland's fox hunting legislation, after a video filmed by investigators
showed a fox being dug out of a hole and then chased by a pack of hounds. 66-year-old John Clive Richardson and his son, 24-year-old
Johnny Riley [right, Credit ITV Border], have gone on trial accused of allowing the hounds to chase the fox ,which
took place near Jedburgh in February 2016. Jedburgh Sheriff Court was shown a video which had been filmed by an employee of the League Against Cruel Sports, which showed members of the Jedforest Hunt - including
the two accused.
James Hood told Jedburgh Sheriff Court that while it was illegal to deliberately hunt a wild mammal
with a dog there were some exceptions to that. Commenting on the video of the Jedforest Hunt, he said: "A fox can be
flushed by dogs from cover to guns. My opinion from the footage of the two incidents is that the fox is pursued by a number
of hounds across open ground with one or two horsemen and other persons present. The pursuit is beyond what is allowed in
the exception." The footage shows the fox disappearing into a blind spot with the dogs still chasing, so what happened
to the fox was not captured on film.
The court was told that lawyers acting for two huntsmen, intend to lead evidence
saying that the dogs were flushing the fox towards a gunman who was in the blind spot, where the fox was then shot. But Mr
Hood - a retired police officer - said he could not hear any gunshots on the videos or any sign of gunmen. He also visited
the scene three weeks after the alleged offence and discovered the carcass of a fox in the dead ground area. All that was
remaining was a vertebrae and three legs intact and round the paws there was some red fur. Mr Hood said a post-mortem was
carried out on the carcass and there was no evidence that the fox had been shot.
But he agreed under cross-examination
from defence lawyer, David McKie, that he could not say for certain that it was the same fox which the video had shown being
pursued by the dogs. The trial of the pair has been adjourned
until next month. The case is due to resume on May 8th.
Eggesford FH official convicted of
stealing supporter & riding club funds
Gets 20 month suspended sentence and CSO for embezzling £84,000
28-4-17 Western Morning News Huntmaster took £84,000 from Devon countryside clubs A
Devon huntmaster has admitted stealing £84,000 while acting as treasurer for two country sports clubs. Graeme Holmes
[left], 59, took the cash while in charge of the purse strings of the Eggesford Hunt Supporters' Club and the
Sid and Otter Riding Club. He defrauded both clubs of funds for almost a decade and used the money to keep up his image as a pillar of the local rural community. The successful IT salesman was a joint leader of the hunt, kept a stable of
horses and bought a large house near Lapford.
But Judge Geoffrey Mercer QC told him his reputation now lay in tatters. He added:
“What you did as I see it was very dishonest and it isn't clear to me why it was necessary to do it at all frankly.
But it was a gross breach of trust. You treated money and funds of these organisations of which you were the treasurer as
if they were your own and you've been caught."
Holmes pleaded guilty to abusing his position as treasurer of the Eggesford Hunt
Supporters' Club between January 15, 2007 and April 15, 2016. He also admitted the same offence against the Sid and Otter
Valley Riding Club between August 26, 2008 and April 8, 2016. He has since paid all the money back.
Hunter said Holmes had volunteered to take up the role of hunt treasurer in 2004. He job was to hand the cash to the bank
and bank cheques, among other duties. But when suspicions were raised the club checked the account and found almost £48,000
missing, leaving them with just £580.
Holmes had been a member of the riding club since 2006 and took the treasurer role
in 2008. He had control of the debit card which he used to draw money for himself and had cheques made out to him. The club
expected to find £30,000 in its account but when it checked the figure was much less. Holmes admitted taking £36,000
Richard Crabb, mitigating, said: “He is a man of previous good character who used about £84,000 of hunt
funds for his own purposes. Every penny has now been paid back." He said Holmes was a man who earned a lot of money as
an IT sales team leader in the Home Counties. He moved to Lapford with his wife and bought a large house 'that needed
a lot of work'. He became part and parcel of the local equestrian scene and lived beyond his means."
He hunted on a regular
basis and was regarded as a 'pillar of the community'. When the post of treasurer came up the club 'considered
his trappings of wealth and thought he was a very successful man' and was delighted to have him. But he estimated that
he lived beyond his means by £8,000 a year.
Mr Crabb said there had been a backlash in the local community against Holmes after
what he had done. Holmes had cashed-in his pension to pay the money back but was not left with a large tax bill.
Judge Mercer said
he was lucky the Conservative government had changed the law to allow pension pots to be cashed in early. “The amount
of money is substantial," said the judge. “Your saving grace is that you have been able to pay back the money you
took and it's fully repaid."
Holmes was sentenced to 20 months in jail, suspended for 18 months. He must do 150
hours unpaid work and pay costs of £550.
Court shown film of fox dig, flushing and chase at Jedforest
LACS monitor says 'appalling' acts illegal and against MFHA rules
27-4-17 Border Telegraph Video footage shown in fox-hunting trial Video evidence showing a fox being dug
out of a hole and then chased by a pack of hounds has been described as "appalling" at Jedburgh Sheriff Court [right].
Witnesses claimed that the footage proved "traditional" fox hunting is still going on despite legislation being
introduced 15 years ago.
An investigator from the League Against Cruel Sports gave the court his verdict on two videos filming the activities of the Jedforest Hunt at Townfoothill Farm near Jedburgh, on February 18 last year. Peter Cross filmed
the incident on a video camera from a distance of 650 metres along with fellow investigator Terence Hill after they both set
an observation point for a covert operation. The footage captured a fox being chased into an earth by the hounds and then
a man spending more than 20 minutes digging a hole to locate the fox.
The law says the fox should then be dispatched or killed
by a hand pistol or shotgun. But the footage shows the fox being released from the hole and immediately pursued by the
hounds. The fox goes out of sight behind a land ridge - a blind spot for the cameramen - and its fate cannot be confirmed.
Mr Cross told the
court: "What we have witnessed there is in direct contradiction of the Masters of Foxhounds Association rules. It is
not only an illegal act but I think their governing body would like to have words about their behaviour too. If it is known
a fox is in the earth they can be dug down and dispatched with a pistol if the farmer requires pest control." Referring
to the hounds chasing the fox he said: "It is just not necessary to do that to a fox. Personally I find it appalling."
Father and son John
Clive Richardson, 66, and 24-year-old Johnny Riley from the Jedforest Hunt are on trial accused of deliberately hunting a
fox with hounds - which has been illegal in Scotland since the Protection of Wild Mammals Act 2002. The trial of Richardson
and Riley of Abbotrule, Bonchester Bridge, continues.
Pic below shows Jedforest FH
allegedly hunting a fox on 18-2-16
Fitzwilliam FH illegal hunting case is adjourned yet
Trial now due to start 20 months after alleged offences
25-4-17 Morethanjustbadgers.net Court Politics Just a short update this week as I had hoped to be making the final
preparations for my time in court as a witness for the prosecution of the 2 members of the Fitzwilliam Hunt. When you consider
the offence took place on the 01/01/16 you begin to understand that the legal process is not something which proceeds quickly
and there is good reason for that. However the when dates and locations for the hearing get changed multiple times it can
get somewhat frustrating.
The case was supposed to be heard this week (26/27th) at Chelmsford Magistrates but I was contacted
by a court official only last week and informed that the case would now be heard in August at Colchester Magistrates. While
this delay is annoying the reasons behind it could be deemed to be in the prosecution's favour. Due to the high profile
of the case it couldn't be heard in the county where the offence took place (Cambridgeshire) so other courts and magistrates
had to be considered. I was informed the reason for the late delay was due to "court politics". According to a legal
expert who has been advising me court politics usually refers to a "magistrate that was due to hear the case that had
obviously expressed some views about hunting which compromised their ability to hear the case objectively".
This being the case,
I guess I should be pleased with the delay although that statement could be taken in the both for and against (hunting) points
of view. Further details from the court official once again highlighted that this particular case was more akin to that of
a murder trial (to be honest I consider it a murder trial of the fox on that fateful day) in that it is being heavily scrutinised
and is also the first time the use of the Bird of Prey Exemption has been challenged in the courts.
officer also contacted me the day after asking if we were all ready to go and I had to inform him of the further delays as
he was unaware. From his point of view it made no difference as he wouldn't have to attend the court on the day. Even
though he was the investigating officer he didn't conduct any of the interviews so wouldn't be cross examined by the
defence, as this was done by more senior colleagues from the serious crime section, another sign that things were being taken
very seriously indeed.
While preparing for my day in court I did go over my statement and also reviewed the video footage.
It doesn't get any easier to watch and of course in my mind there can be only one outcome but, this is the Hunting Act
and nothing is straight forward where that is concerned.
Pic below - The accused. Huntsman George Adams and bird handler John Mease.
POWAperson comments - I really hope the writer is correct in his assessment
of the reasons for these extraordinary delays [though 20 months must be a record], and if a hunt sympathising judge has been
recused, that must be good. But I have my doubts. Time and again we see illegal hunting cases being stretched out, often by
defence manoeuvring, and how often that ends with acquittals or the CPS dropping charges - and that's just in the rare
cases where the CPS do summon up the bottle to take on the hunt side's 'expensive lawyers'.
Man charged over fox found captive near Belvoir
comes 17 months after incident - Hunt deny involved
24-4-17 Facebook - Beds & Bucks Hunt Sabs A man has been charged with animal welfare offences regarding the fox which was found in an outbuilding
in preparation for the Belvoir Hunt which was meeting close by. Nigel Smith (59), of Stainby, Lincs, is due in court next
month. Of course, the Hunt are denying everything claiming no knowledge or involvement. This is pretty standard behaviour.
Get the serfs to do the dirty work then let them carry the can when and it they get found out.
POWAperson adds - The original story can be found here and here. Pic below - the fox found in the shed by LACS' investigators.
Anti gets to see her apology
letter from hunter abuser after 4 months
His tirade of sexist abuse got him a conditional caution including
previously refused to allow victim to see his apology letter
24-4-17 Daily Mail Anti-hunt activist who was called a 'f*****g slag' and a 'whore'
at a protest battles for FOUR MONTHS to see a copy of her abuser's apology letter - Hunt spectator subjected Cathy Scott
to barrage of foul-mouthed sexist abuse - He called her 'a f****** fat s***' and told her to 'f*** off back to
Coventry' After a video of the incident went viral, the unnamed man received a police caution over
the incident on the condition he provided a written apology. Ms Scott said she had to battle police for four months to
get a copy of the letter.
Cathy Scott was
labelled a 'f****** slag' and a 'whore' by a 59-year-old man in Sutton Cheney, Leics, last November. After a video of the incident went viral on social media sites, the unnamed man received a police caution
over the incident, on the condition he provided a written apology. The video emerged just days after a local councillor on
horseback told a hunt protester that he would 'quite like to s***' her.
But after Ms Scott asked Leicestershire Police why she hadn't received the letter, she claims she was told she
would have to view it at a police station but wouldn't be able to touch or keep it due to its 'sensitive nature'.
When Ms Scott, 41, complained about the 'bizarre' decision, she says she was then offered a version of the letter
with the perpetrator's name redacted. It was only after Ms Scott lodged a formal complaint that she eventually got given
a copy of the letter - some four months after the incident, and two months after it was written.
Ms Scott, from Coventry, Warwickshire, said: 'Leicestershire Police were essentially protecting the perpetrator and treating
me, the victim, like a criminal. If I have to jump through hoops like that to get a simple letter of apology, what chance
do other victims of more serious crimes have? They told me I could come and read the letter at arm's length - what sort
of rule is that? It was agreed that as part of his conditional caution he would write me a letter of apology and take a victim
awareness course. Did they think I would never ask about the letter? This man called me some of the most horrible, misogynistic
names under the sun. He waved his fist at me and another woman and we really did feel threatened."
"I had to chase the letter up time and time again and they gave me this most peculiar
excuse that because it had details of a 'sensitive nature' they couldn't let me keep it. Obviously I questioned
this but they were adamant that I couldn't have it and would have to meet a police officer to look at it. It was absolutely
ludicrous and if I hadn't have fought it, I'd probably still be waiting for the apology."
The shocking footage was shared on Facebook by members of the West
Midlands Hunt Saboteurs, who were on the country road to protest against the Atherstone Hunt. Ms Scott
and another member of the West Midlands Hunt Saboteur group were involved in a confrontation with two men. after a collision
between their cars during a hunt on November 29th last year. One man got out of his vehicle and said to Ms Scott: 'You
want some of this, f*****? Eh?' before adding: 'F*** off back to Coventry where you belong you f****** w****.'
Ms Scott said: 'We were there to monitor activity on the hunt. We
stopped our vehicle on the lane because we could see them coming down the track. They drove their vehicle into us and that's when I was met with this tirade of
abuse. It was really nasty stuff. He was effing and blinding and calling me all the names under the sun, all on camera. It
was completely unacceptable language. I told him it was some of the worst abuse I had ever heard. It was unprovoked and unnecessary.
I was feeling massively intimidated and that's why I reported it to the police. To be fair, they dealt with the initial
incident swiftly. But I didn't expect to be waiting on an apology all this time later. He wrote the letter in January
for goodness sake and I only got it in March.'
is believed the unnamed man must now attend a victim awareness course which he must pay for himself and he must write a letter
of apology to the victim. The letter read: 'I am writing this letter of apology to you as instructed, I apologise to you
for the coarse language and derogatory comments used against you on Tuesday the 29th of November 2016. On the gated road [in]
Sutton Cheney. The comments were made in the heat of the moment, and for that I apologise.'
A Leicestershire Police spokesperson said: 'An initial decision was made by an officer
not to provide a copy of the apology letter due to some of the content within. A complaint was made from the victim regarding
this which coincided with a review from a more senior officer on the original decision. After a review, this officer agreed
to provide a copy of the apology letter to the victim. A complaint from the victim is still under investigation by our Professional
Standards department therefore it would be inappropriate for us to comment any further at this stage.'
Tory councillor Charles Carter, 33, quit his position at Breckland Council
after a video of him being sexist and misogynistic to a hunt protester went viral. Carter told Linda Hoggard, who filmed his
derogatory comments, that she was 'very pretty' and asked if he could take her to bed.
Original story and video can be found here.
Sabs stop Cheriton Mink Hounds from hunting
Facebook - Devon County Hunt Saboteurs Today we stopped the Cheriton/former Devon & Cornwall Minkhounds from killing wildlife on the river
Torridge. Together with Somerset Sabs and South Devon Animal Rights we turned up to their meet at the Stevenstone Hunt kennels
in Torrington and packed them up before they even got the hounds out of the trailer. A fairly relaxed stand-off ensued while
the hunt members (all 6 of them) considered their options. One of them entertained us with the usual drivel about wildlife
'management', immigration, townies and ISIS. When we reminded him that hunting a wild mammal (including otters and
mink) with hounds was illegal, out came the familiar excuse, "oh but we're just here to exercise them". When
asked why he minded us observing the hounds being 'exercised', he said "well they might bump into an otter...
and then we'd be doing what you're suggesting we're going to do". ... After an hour of standing around in
a field, the hunt made the sensible decision to head home to avoid any 'accidental' hunting. Two hours and many country
lanes later they were safely tucked up back at the kennels. Job done.
Motorists appalled by horrific death on road of deer
after Exmoor Hunt
Quantock Stag Hounds
believed to be responsible for outrage
Exmoor resident Sir Rannulph Fiennes says he feels 'ashamed'
LACS brands the deer killing as 'utterly horrific'
21-4-17 Devon Live Drivers horrified to witness 'public execution' of terrified deer A scared
deer leaped from a bridge on to a road and was 'executed' by a huntsman yesterday in front of several 'disgusted'
members of the public, according to someone who witnessed the incident.
An eyewitness, who does not wish to be named, said
the shocking ordeal left her 'horrified and deeply saddened' after the 'exhausted' animal was cornered by hounds on a bridge above a public road near Dulverton [right].
She watched as the scene played out and said she was left in 'pure disgust', and questioned how such a 'barbaric
ordeal' was legal.
Speaking to DevonLive, she said: "I am not the usual type to complain about anything to this
degree but yesterday I witnessed something which deeply saddened and disgusted me along with many other members of public
present at the time. "The staghounds were out on a hunt close to the Mason's Kings, not far from Black Cat, Dulverton
way and they had clearly been chasing a poor stag for some time when it came to the old railway bridge. he hounds had it cornered
and the poor animal was so exhausted it could hardly stand, it's tongue hanging out and it's body wobbling all over
She said she, along with others, were held up on the road when quad bikes and other vehicles blocked the animal's
escape routes and a gunman scrambled up the side of the bridge towards the animal. She said: "The animal, clearly distressed,
took one look at its only route to potential escape and threw itself off the top of the 30ft bridge and crashed on to the
road below in front of all of the members of public. The animal lay in the road - seriously injured but still alive - to which
the gunman then shot and ended the prolonged suffering."
She and many others watching were horrified by the 'barbaric ordeal'. She
said: "Members of the public were frantic, shouting at the huntsmen in pure disgust. All of this is actually completely
legal - how is this allowed? I think the law has a great deal to answer for. I am not against controlling populations of wildlife
such as deer and foxes. I live on a nearby farm and have studied wildlife related subjects at a university level so have a
good understanding of the countryside. I do not, however, think there is a place for such practices in this day and that alternative
more humane and effective ways exist to manage wild populations and it is about time that these animals were protected and
DevonLive has contacted several local staghound groups to ask who organised the hunt, but none of them have yet responded.
POWAperson adds - We have been privately informed that the Hunt responsible was the Quantock Stag Hounds. This Hunt
already carries 2 convictions for illegal hunting. Sir Rannulph Fiennes, an Exmoor resident who turned against hunting after
his local hunt killed a fox that used to visit him, has made the following Facebook post -
21-4-17 Facebook - Sir Ranulph Fiennes As a resident of Exmoor I am ashamed!
Pic below, credit DevonLive
25-4-17 Devon Live League Against Cruel Sports brands deer killing on busy road as 'utterly horrific'
A charity which vows to protect animals from cruelty in sports has branded the public killing of a deer on a main
road as "shocking and utterly horrific". The League Against Cruel Sports contacted DevonLive after reading our story
about a scared deer leaped which from a bridge on to a road and was 'executed' by a huntsman. The incident took place
last Thursday (April 20) in front of several 'disgusted' members of the public, according to a driver who saw the
events unfurl. The eyewitness, who did not wish to be named, said the shocking ordeal left her 'horrified and deeply saddened'
after the 'exhausted' animal was cornered by hounds on a bridge above the A396 road near Dulverton.
Now the League
Against Cruel Sports (LACS), a charity which campaigns to ban hunting in the UK, has condemned the incident and says deaths
like these need to stop. Eduardo Goncalves, chief executive of LACS, said: "This was utterly horrific for the stag and
shocking for the members of the public who witnessed it. Unfortunately the killing of stags like this isn't as uncommon as people might hope. "Stag hunting is banned,
but some hunts in and around Devon and Somerset continue to chase these animals, and continue to make excuses as to why deaths
occur. Frankly it needs to stop. Don't think this was a one off. The League Against Cruel Sports has a wildlife sanctuary
near Dulverton and we have to keep guard on a regular basis to stop hunts from chasing deer onto our land. I can't put
a figure on the number of deer and stags who have run full tilt onto our land to reach safety. Reports from this incident
say the stag appeared exhausted – that suggests it had been chased over a long period. Any suggestion that it was merely
discovered by the hunt, or was accidentally chased for a short period before reaching the bridge, doesn't seem to match
the facts. Sometimes hunts claim they are 'helping' an injured stag by chasing it to put it down. That doesn't
sound like animal welfare to me."
Speaking on Friday, an eyewitness told DevonLive how the incident left
her in "pure disgust", and questioning how such a "barbaric ordeal" could be legal. She said: "I
am not the usual type to complain about anything to this degree but this deeply saddened and disgusted me. The staghounds
had clearly been chasing the poor stag for some time when it came to the old railway bridge. The hounds had it cornered and
the poor animal was so exhausted it could hardly stand, it's tongue hanging out and it's body wobbling all over the
place." She said she, along with others, were held up on the
road when quad bikes and other vehicles blocked the animal's escape routes and a gunman scrambled up the side of the bridge
towards the animal...
DevonLive has contacted
Avon and Somerset Police to see if they are aware of the matter. No hunt has yet claimed responsibility for the incident.
DevonLive has tried to contact several hunts in the area, but none have got back to us.
Pic above right - Blood stains left on A396
POWA presses for strengthening commitment in Labour
20-4-17 Protect Our
Wild Animals has written to the Labour Party leadership and MPs requesting that a commitment to strengthen the Hunting Act
2004 be included in the Party's manifesto for the election on June 8th. Even if Labour do not win power this time, such
a commitment will make it easier to get it made official party policy and included in any future manifesto. Penny Little,
POWA member and highly experienced hunt monitor, has also launched a petition requesting a strengthening commitment. Please sign this urgently and share as widely as you can.
Include in the manifesto a commitment to
strengthen the Hunting Act
Town Council secret meeting with Atherstone FH exposed by
20-4-17 Facebook - West Midlands Hunt Saboteurs Atherstone Town Council in secret meeting with Hunt Despite the
public interest in The Atherstone Hunt, who have had their violent, abusive, and criminal behaviour reported on by the media
over 80 times, Atherstone Town Council have seen fit to accept the hunt's request for a private meeting over the violent
events in the Market Square on the 02/01/2017. This meeting took place on 15/03/2017. We have no way of knowing what the Council
and the hunt discussed as there are no notes or minutes that can be scrutinised. We will keep a closer eye on the activity
of the Council from now on. Further unaccountable 'shadow' meetings with criminal bloodsport fanatics are unacceptable
and disrespectful to all those who want justice & respect for wild animals.
The Council claim they have yet to
make a decision over the Atherstone Hunts future use of the Market Square and are due to have a secret meeting with senior
officers from Warwickshire Police. The same police force who are partially responsible for the violence by choosing not to
police the event and who have subsequently lied and tried to cover up their involvement.
How can Atherstone Town Council make
an impartial decision over this issue when the Councillors who have vested interests in the hunt are allowed to vote on the
issue? All vested interests in the Atherstone Hunt should be
declared and anyone with interests in the hunt should abstain from decision making. Complaints should be directed to http://www.atherstone-tc.gov.uk/contact-us.
Badsworth FH filmed trespassing along a canal towpath,
not for first time
Reported to landowners the Canal and River Trust
14-4-17 Wildlife Guardian Fox hunt ignored warning signs to trespass on canal towpaths A fox Hunt’s
actions have been branded as extremely irresponsible for endangering public safety after repeatedly ignoring warning signs
and galloping down narrow canal towpaths with a pack of foxhounds. The Badsworth and Bramham Moor Hunt have been reported
to the Canal & River Trust for riding along towpaths on the New Junction Canal at Sykehouse and Fishlake, nr Doncaster,
on several occasions during the past six months.
The Canal & River Trust, who manage the canal, prohibit horses using towpaths
due to the serious risk to the public as well as the horses. During the latest incident, a local resident, who did not wish
to be named, claimed that the Hunt, along with 30 foxhounds, spent up to an hour on the towpaths at Sykehouse and Fishlake,
despite warning signs clearly prohibiting horses on the towpath.
Mobile phone footage seen by the Wildlife Guardian shows Huntsman Richard Mould
and Joint Master Nigel Dickson galloping down the towpath as the hounds are in cry. The Hunt then head to the opposite towpath,
where the hounds are encouraged to hunt through wildlife habitat owned by the Canal & River Trust. The Hunt’s terriermen
and terriers were later seen joining the Hunt on the towpath. The trespass occurred in full view of a Canal & River Trust
manned station, and despite previous incidents being reported to the Trust, no action was taken to stop the Hunt.
A spokesman for the
Wildlife Guardian stated, “The Badsworth and Bramham Moor Hunt behaviour is utterly reckless and they are endangering
the safety of legitimate users of the towpaths, such as dog walkers and cyclists. They also demonstrated a blatant disregard
for the safety of the horses. This is not an isolated incident, it’s occurring five or six times a year. It’s
only a matter of time before someone is seriously injured. The Canal & River Trust cannot keep turning a blind eye to
the trespass and the extremely irresponsible actions of the Badsworth and Bramham Moor Hunt.”
In 2014, a photo of
the Badsworth and Bramham Moor Hunt trespassing on the same towpath, led by then huntsman Nigel Dickson, was published on
the Countryside Alliance Facebook page. Last year the Hunt made
the national news when hunt saboteurs were driven at by terriermen in balaclavas on a quad bike.
Minehead Harriers hunt on NT land where recent bTb breakdown
11-4-17 Facebook - Chris Tasker Do hunts give a toss about biosecurity ? Er, No ! On 1st December 2016, Cloutsham Farm, nr Minehead was
listed for a bTB breakdown. So on 29th January 2017, the Minehead Harriers had a meet at the farm and spent 4 hours on the
farm fields pretending to trail hunt, complete with equipped terriermen, a dozen riders, riders on point and overloaded quad
bikes. To compound the issue, they had invited another hunt to join them, the Tiverton Foxhounds, so spreading whatever they
picked up another 25 miles when they went home. The farm is National Trust property, and the Hunt had a trail licence from
Police powers to demand face mask removal enhanced
Alliance New power to remove face coverings from violent protesters comes into effect today
Today (3rd April) police have been given new powers to remove face coverings from violent protestors. Last month,
Minister of State for Policing, Rt Hon Brandon Lewis MP, wrote to all Police Constables making them aware of a new power to
make it easier for police officers to request that face coverings be removed from violent protestors. The Minister’s
letter follows a Countryside Alliance led campaign.
Last December the House of Lords passed a Government amendment to the Policing and
Crime Bill which will make it easier for the police to tackle violent masked protestors. The amendment was in response to
concerns raised regarding the inability of police to request the removal of face coverings from violent protestors without
prior written authorisation from a senior police officer. Last months letter by the Minister’s informed Police Constables
that the new provision will commence on today (3rd April).
The amendment means that a senior police officer will be able to give immediate
oral authorisation for a constable to remove face-coverings, where it is impracticable for that authorisation to be given
in writing. The law had required prior written authorisation that the police have grounds for reasonable belief that activities
may take place in an area that are likely to involve the commission of offences. The conditions and protections remain exactly
the same, but the fast track process will now allow the police to tackle a serious issue both in rural communities and elsewhere.
Research by the Countryside
Alliance using the Freedom of Information Act published last year revealed that the powers had only been used on one occasion
in the past three years to require animal rights activists at a hunt to remove face coverings, despite the use of masks to
intimidate and hide identity being a standard tactic of hunt saboteurs. The powers had been used on many occasions in relation
to pre-arranged demonstrations and football matches.
Alliance Chief Executive, Tim Bonner said:- “There are only two reasons for
wearing masks and face-coverings in the context of a protest: to intimidate and harass, and to hide identity with the intention
of committing criminal offences and avoiding prosecution. This is a tactic that has worked, not only by creating alarm and
distress in rural communities visited by groups of extremists who have adopted the uniform of the paramilitary complete with
standard black face coverings, but also in allowing offences to be committed crimes without any legal consequences. From Wiltshire
to Derbyshire; from Gloucestershire to Yorkshire there have been a series of violent assaults by hunt saboteurs in the last
few years, none of which have seen anyone brought to justice. It doesn’t matter if violence and intimidation are happening
in urban areas or the countryside, it is wrong and it’s only right that police officers are in the position to be able
to tackle effectively potentially criminal behaviour wherever it arises. We are therefore delighted that the Government has
recognised the need to amend the law, recognising that the police need greater flexibility faced with modern types of protests.
The amendment does not extend police powers, but makes it more practical to use existing powers and we now expect the police
to make full use of them. For too long a small minority have hidden behind masks and disguises to intimidate people and to
escape being held account for unlawful behaviour. This change in the law will discourage unlawful activity, whilst allowing
lawful and peaceful protest.”
POWAperson comments - The CA and their hunting
friends could well find the old saw 'Be careful what you wish for...' coming back to bite them. Hunt thugs and even
some redcoats commonly mask up in order to conceal their identities from anti cameras, so they can carry out their illegal
hunting and assaults on antis with even greater impunity than they currently enjoy. If the police apply these new powers fairly
[admittedly, this is far from a given] they will lose that anonymity and the chances of their being arrested and charged will
be that much greater.
VWH FH run away as monitors find hounds marking to ground
Facebook - Cirencester Illegal Hunt Watch 5th April. Not enough for you VWH? On Wednesday 5th April, a walker came
on them [the Vale of the White Horse Hunt] yet again hunting in Cirencester Park. This time a secretive meet
with a small field of followers, horseboxes and hound lorry all clustered together near the polo ground. It was late in the
day but we managed to rally a couple of people and, trying to make a good guess, came in from the Overly Road where we came
right on the Hunt with the hounds searching.
Just as we arrived and got seen by the redcoats, they went on cry and as we were
already slightly behind them all we could do is follow. Just as we heard the disappearing sound of the hunting horn we rounded
a bend to find part of the pack marking to ground and the rest of the Hunt completely vanished. The hounds were frantically
digging at a hole, making it clear that the fox they had been pursuing had escaped underground. We got them off and they hung
around as the Hunt had apparently abandoned them - maybe worried after the witnessed kill last Saturday? But they eventually
drifted off and we guarded the area until we were sure they were not coming back for this fox, and visited again later to
check. The Hunt had really run and we could not find them again, but we felt that at least we had managed to save this fox
- for now.
Vale of the White Horse FH slaughter fox in front
Charged recklessly on to A roads before and after the kill
filmed them and have reported Hunt to police
Quote from monitor - "I know that
what I saw today will stay with me the rest of my life. One moment that beautiful creature was in front of me running for
his life, and the next I was looking at his blood soaking into the ground."
6-4-17 Facebook - Cirencester Illegal Hunt Watch Vale of the White Horse FH, Saturday 1st April The Hunt met at a farm behind Coates
and after bursting out onto the main Tetbury A433 road, chased and killed a fox in front of four of our team in the fields
behind Cirencester Agricultural University The fox never had a chance as there were Hunt officials and groups of riders blocking
every escape. Just like Wednesday, they seemed to be hunting recklessly with no heed for cameras or the law. A redcoat tried
to block our view, but one of our monitors was coming from the other direction and was able to film. The Huntsman got off
his horse and ran off with the body, leaving gobbets of flesh, hair and blood on the ground. We are talking to the Police
and will be putting up footage in due course.
This event did not stop the VWH hunting foxes that day. They went on cry again between
Tarlton and the A433 Tetbury road, but 3Cs sab working with us that day rated the hounds off the fox. We managed to get monitors
in to the areas they were drawing around Tarlton Wood and towards the Tunnel Inn, and once again a CIHW monitor got the hounds
heads up as they started on a scent. they finally disrupted the very busy A419 Stroud Road to take the Hunt across into the
main park, where they went up the length of the park and back, seeming to be at last inhibited by a public event within the
park, packing up at around five.
A member of CIWH [also of POWA] told us - Monitors saw no
'trail' laid before hunting began next to the main Tetbury road. The hounds burst out onto the main road, disrupting
the traffic before going towards the back of the University farm.
When the hounds went into
cry the huntsmen made no effort to stop them until it was too late A fox was seen by a monitor fleeing for its life, just
before the pack caught it. The Hunt officials seemed to panic. The Huntsman galloped over, viciously whipped the hounds off
and rushed away on foot with the body, running from the camera [see pic above]. Monitors filmed the remains - chunks of flesh,
hair, skin and blood.
‘The worst of it is,’ she said 'orphaned fox cubs may have been
left underground, where they will experience a slow and terrible death by starvation. Wildlife rescue centres are currently
taking in fox cubs, some born as early as February. The Hunt will claim there were trails laid, but they were seen searching
near main roads and through fields of oil seed rape, where they would be likely to find foxes resting up in cover. Like many
other Hunts, they will claim the kill was an 'accident', but we filmed them chasing more foxes later in the day.
We are supplying footage to the police and call for the law to be enforced against Hunts that we believe repeatedly chase
and kill foxes 'accidentally on purpose’.
VWH FH relentlessly hunted fox late in day and
may have killed
6-4-17 Facebook - Cirencester Illegal Hunt Watch VWH Hunt, Wednesday 29th March We were tipped off that the Vale of the White
Horse FH were in Cirencester Park and two of us, plus a Three Counties sab managed to attend. It was a 'children's
meet' but as we have witnessed before, once the children have left in the middle of the day, the Hunt gets down to it.
From mid afternoon
they hunted up and down the main section of the park on the Sapperton side, where we found them. 3Cs sab got the hounds off one tired fox, but they were relentlessly after another - just glimpsed by CIHW at
the Overly Road as it ran across with the hounds in cry after it, just too far away to try and stop them. The redcoats came
blasting out onto the road after the hounds and refused to call them off even though they were told a fox had been seen.
The fox ran in a large
circle, across the road and back into the main park and round again. The redcoat did retreat once when he came on a CIHW monitor
with a camera. They had clearly lost the scent at one point, and were witnessed by CIHW bringing the hounds back to the spot
and putting them to search through the thick undergrowth until they picked up on the scent again.
We have seen this
before, but this time there was a difference. The redcoats and the small hardcore of riders left in the last hours of this
hunt were avidly and blatantly hunting, totally ignoring our presence and absolutely relentless in pursuit of the fox, which
they chased the length of the park and back again, for around one and a half hours, finally going quiet at 6.30. We strongly
believe it was the same fox because the monitors trying to track the Hunt in the extensive woodland of Cirencester Park could
hear the hounds go off cry, losing the scent followed by a shortish pause when they would be back on again. We have heard
many times that at the end of the season Hunts become even more determined and bloodthirsty. We saw it. We do not know how
it ended as a hunt suddenly going quiet can mean a kill or that the fox has gone to ground, to be dug out by terriermen and
Film of monitor's car windscreen being smashed at
S.Dorset FH meet
Video also has stills of young riders struggling to escape bog
2-4-17 Facebook - Dorset Hunt Sabs VIDEO Hit Report Thursday 30th March 2017, South Dorset Hunt Meeting
at Rollington Farm, Corfe Castle This [2nd] report focuses on two specific incidents of the day.
During the early part of the day, while the field were travelling through the forestry not far from the Oil Gathering
Station, three young riders not knowing the all-consuming bogs in the area rode off track. Their horses sunk into the bog and threw the young riders. The horses, now under some stress, thrashed around to get a footing in the brown foul-smelling
bog [right]. The monitor who was close by stopped videoing and carefully ‘danced’ over to the area trying
to avoid the deepest of the bog sumps and gullies.
was concerned the horses would endanger the young riders by falling on them and pushing them into the bog. After asking the
young riders if they were okay he beckoned over adult riders. Two of the ponies came out of the bog without to much stress.
The third was seriously struggling and moving the wrong way. Eventually the pony was persuaded to turn and came out the bog
in the direction from which he came. Riders and ponies looked to be okay on exit from the bog, although probably stressed.
When the very same monitor returned to his car at the end of hunting
he found his windscreen smashed. It appeared to have been smashed with a hard object [Dash-cam still below].
Police, who were on site all day, were called and attended. Frankly they were furious at what had happened and will follow
up the crime. After the monitor was on the scene of the bog incident and standing by to help earlier in the day he was extremely
disappointed that a hunt follower should resort to such vandalism.
Note: The vehicle had a ‘dash cam’. The video from the dash cam is now being studied for evidence of
who committed the crime. We have set up a GFM to pay for the damage to the monitors car, we have worked
closely with him this season. We are in awe of his experience and he is one of the kindest and caring gentlemen you will ever
'Notorious' hunt supporter to be charged at last
over 'vicious assault'
1-4-17 Facebook – Outpaced We hate to tease with half a story but sometimes we have no choice. Outpaced, after a two year case have had
a significant result in which one of the hunts most notorious and odious individuals is about to be prosecuted. It's even
more satisfying that he thinks he has long got away with his vicious assault. We took it to the highest of review level with
the CPS and at last to a specialist prosecutor. Given a couple of outrageous acquittals recently our compliments to the CPS
in recognising that public interest is best served in bringing this case. We are only not giving more detail as we don't
want to spoil his surprise. At such a time, I f the victim gives permission, we will publish the full story.
Enter content here